Thursday, January 28, 2010

Cap'n Trade

"Wall Street Bull"
--by Horatio Algeranon

Cap'n Trade
Was tailor made
For Wall Street captains
Who get paid

For Blackjack doubles,
And blowing bubbles,
And generally,
Just causing troubles.


Climate scientist James Hansen, who much prefers a "Fee and 100% Dividend" approach to controlling carbon emissions, points out some of the considerable problems of cap and trade not least of all, the issue Horatio poked fun at above:

Wall Street is poised to make billions of dollars in the “trade” part of cap-and-trade. The market for trading permits to emit carbon appears likely to be loosely regulated, to be open to speculators and to include derivatives. All the profits of this pollution trading system would be extracted from the public via increased energy prices.
The recent economic meltdown should give one reason to pause before putting the fate of our climate and future generations in the hands of Wall Street traders whose primary interest is in maximizing short-term profits (and their own bonuses, of course) -- as opposed to the public good, for which they seem to have little or no concern.

Update: April 20, 2010
Any who think Hansen's fears about "gaming" of the carbon trading system are unwarranted may wish to read this, which includes a
graphic explaining "carbon credit carousel fraud".
//end update

Not to mention the minor issue of whether cap and trade will even be effective in reducing global CO2 emissions to the levels necessary to avoid serious climate change.

The two economists who invented the method (which was used to deal with sulfur dioxide emissions from coal-fired power plants in the US, a relatively limited, "local" problem for which it had some success), have both expressed serious doubts that it would work to limit carbon emissions on a global scale. For the latter, they have favored a carbon tax over cap and trade.




Monday, January 25, 2010

Global warming hasn't ended

-- by Horatio Algeranon

Global warming hasn't ended,
As climate contrarians have contended,
On air, in print and on the net,
About as silly as one can get.

On this main fact, the scientists agree:
Last decade was the warmest in history,
With 2009 among the hottest years
Since records began, confirming fears.

But just as key is the long-term "trend",
Which continues upward without end.
For the past 30 years, at two tenths C per decade,
The rate of increase has been fairly staid.

The chasm separating reality and perception
Is due to denial and deception,
By those who argue for delay,
To avoid responsible action today.



NASA: "2009: Second Warmest Year on Record; End of Warmest Decade" (Click here for article)

A post on Real Climate asks "If It’s That Warm, How Come It’s So Damned Cold?" -- ie, considers the reality of global warming vs the "popular" perception by many non-scientists.



Incoherence

--By Horatio Algeranon

Contradiction
Is an affliction
Born of fiction
And addiction.

Incoherence
Has adherents
And the appearance
Of interference.

Abject denial
So much in style
Thrives on guile
And lots of bile.

Conspiracy,
It's plain to see,
Is certainly
Considered key.



Inspired by a post by climate scientist Michael Tobis: The PinkLine